THE DEATH OF PHYSICAL MEDIA BY THE SYSTEMIC REPLACEMENT BY DIGITAL MEDIA
For many of you viewers you may not fully understand the hidden dangers of this particular action as described here by Mr Corbett. However, if as an individual you have had some form of direct (or even indirect) experience you would know too well the dangers that Mr Corbett here describes as intentional meticulous "doctoring" and "motives" of those with the "WILL" is the "key" dangerous element of what he is describing:
To give you an example in its broadest impact briefly, on a lower level, roughly a "decade" ago I had a brief despicable encounter with certain elements in the immigration department in a country colonially labelled/stamped as Namibia where during the saga a specific immigration female officer (Claudia Shilunga) with some local corrupt police sargent companion (by the name of something like "Omomu") had deceptively convinced the head of the local police station to send out a special team to come to the immigration center and "kidnap" me so as to be tortured and "teach" me a hard lesson (the team sent out to fetch me had been lied to and told that I was a "troublesome Criminal" from a neighboring country called Angola and that I had "committed" such and such atrocities) the night before the next mornings court hearing of my supposed "immigration" case but fortunately the team members realized they had been lied to as the driver that had driven them to collect me recognized me as he had brought me to that location and informed them that I was not an "Angolan" and that they must have the "wrong" person.
Anyway, (cut a long story short) at the end of the saga when I was asked to collect my passport I had noticed a "printed" out document in an open folder that was supposed to be my immigration "case" file. When the immigration officer now charged with handing my passport back to me briefly left the room I leaned over to take a closer look at the printed out digital document that from the writing style looked like something I had typed. But on closer scrutiny while reading it I could not remember ever writing or structuring these sentences in this manner and more so parts of the contents were totally unfamiliar to me.
At first I thought nothing of it excusing it that it was the immigration officers who in a bid to smear me had concocted up the document. But two years later (as it was always on my mind) it dawned upon me that it was actually a "third-party" by name Colleen Kruger who may have (probably in sync with the immigration officer) actually doctored the email as parts of the document did read familiar. Thus, in a nutshell a third party civilian whom I had actually reported her for her suspicious scamming activities at the time to the same authorities for questionable and possible fraudulent behavior had colluded with the authorities in some way and had carefully "doctored" an email I had earlier written to her presenting it as "something" I had written (WHY my email was doctored by her? Till this day beats the imagination as it was not even necessary as the authorities in question were very corrupt anyway) .
Because the document was "digital" they could all collude and have the document doctored and presented to the court without me even knowing (as not even my lawyer had the courtesy to mention the document to me let alone ask me if it was authentic probably "pre-assuming" that I wrote that doctored document).
With digital documentation you are walking on a very slippery slope such that anyone with the "motive" , position, will, as well as "authority" and the "resources" can easily and convincingly (to the naked eye) "doctor" and even erase evidence turning falsehood into truth and truth into falsehood.
This is a very slippery slope that everyone needs to wrap their brains around.`